1. Micro-dose emancipation dialogues using human-AI-enabled neo-learning: an indoctrination antidote to open mindsets about the meaning and implications of equity, the virtue of fairness.
How might we reclaim the original meaning of equity to liberate a diverse abundance of hidden talents and human potential to solve our complex entanglements of self-inflicted wicked problems?
Co-create Equity Project 2029 to undo Project 2025
Event on April 2th Wednesday: 7-8 pm Central.
Click here to register for the Indivisible Zoom call organized by Bill Davis from NWSOFA (Northwest Suburbs, Chicago, Indivisible).
Embark on human-AI-enabled emancipatory neo-learning journeys
Click on any AI links to explain the meaning and implications of new words, jargon, and concepts related to the complexity of ethical questions related to the meaning and implications of equity meta-governance.
Use AI to adjust any sentence, paragraph, or question to any reading level, and make further inquiries by editing or creating your own questions.
Equity meta-governance is the Ultimate Meta-process for Humanity (UMH): co-create fair rules, fair plays, fair games, fair opportunities, and fair rewards on a regenerating planet to benefit all.
AI elaborates on the meaning and implications of the headline title for ethical discernment, moral development, and the virtues ethics of equity meta-governance.
Also, check out this link for another perspective.
How might we understand anti-AI biases?
AI, like politics, religion, media, economics, education, and healthcare, is not unique in that it contains the good, the bad, and the ugly. Anti-AI biases can distract and prevent us from using this efficient tool of process inquiry and content curation to open doors for exploration with discernment.
AI can rapidly generate a variety of different perspectives: using prompts, such as affirm and refute this claim, or ask AI to disagree with your opinion or your version of the facts. These prompts can create cognitive dissonance about dichotomous thinking, ethical discrepancies about moral dilemmas, the ambivalence of dialectics, and emotional reactivity that induces cognitive regression of critical and rational thinking.
How might we set up health disagreements within ourselves and with others that can be healthy, threatening, intimidating, and conflictual, and not unhealthy, destructive, and toxic?
AI elaborates on the meaning and implications of these questions.
AI cannot save us, but we can save ethical AI to do good
This ethical quest calls on us to discern and call in the good AI. AI is like a muse and research assistant that needs human supervision to co-elevate our collective wisdom in developing a broad array of emancipation skills to prevent political and religious indoctrination from rewiring and atrophying our parts of our brains that keep victims locked into prolonged states of cult trances and deranged mass psychosis.
We are pedagogical propaganda victims of teacher-centered passive learning that indoctrinates us on what to think rather than how to think.
To redress the psychological constraints and traumas of this indoctrinating process, we can use ethical AI to rapidly raise the floor of our inquiry, curiosity, and imagination journeys.
This learner-centered strategy enables us to break through the glass ceiling of our mindset limitations arising from our inequitable educational opportunities for learner-centered androgogy: learning how to think and learn, and thinking about how to think (meta-cognition), and learning how to learn (meta-learning), along with a broad array of ontological, psychological, systemic and complexity skills.
For far too many people, the glass ceiling of emancipation is pie in the sky, depriving humanity of accessing a vast untapped abundance of hidden talents and resources. Equity is a divergent liberator and not a convergent constraintor of human potential. It enables us to lower the ceiling of emancipation so that we can break through to the other side and freedom from the groupthink of indoctrination.
How can we call in ethical AI to do good and call out the bad and the ugly?
AI elaborates on the meaning and implications of these questions.
AI is a phenomenal resource to break down structural and systemic educational inequities. We can use the emancipation of androgogy to liberate ourselves in charting our learning journeys of inquiry and collaborating within and across networks of beloved learning communities.
This exponential quest calls on us to launch a chain reaction of fission energy to launch the Manhattan Project for mindset emancipation and liberation from political and religious indoctrination.
How can we chart our human-AI-enabled emancipatory journeys to design our collaborative lifelong intergenerational learning processes of becoming open-minded, truth-seeking, and virtuous free-thinkers to do good for the commons, humanity, the common good, and the well-being of all life, and to regenerate the health of our planet?
AI elaborates on the meaning and implications of these questions.
Align the political-public-private sectors to do for all and the planet
This quest uses a collaborative virtue ethics framework of cultivating equity meta-governance to transcend political-public-private boundaries. The strategies explore how to build a bipartisan "purpleprint" for Project 2029 by effectively deploying both calling-in and calling-out strategies to advance equity
How might we, the middle majority, build the middle ground to co-create the bipartisan “purpleprint” for Project 2029 to:
Call-in and negotiate a shared meaning about equity, the virtue of fairness, and equity meta-governance?
Call-out the cultural, systemic, and individual prejudices against fairness?
AI elaborates on the meaning and implications of these questions.
Experience emancipation dialogue micro-doses
The goal of hosting these micro-dose emancipation dialogues is to create self-organizing, self-generating, and self-governing beloved learning communities about how we can cultivate equity governance to co-create Equity Project 2029.
This lays the groundwork to advocate for forming a coalition of 100 or more organizations coming together to develop Equity Project 2029 as a countercoup to Project 2025, the self-righteous fundamentalist neo-terrorism of Christian Nationalism, and the alt-right propaganda machine.
We need the lights from a constellation of virtues to guide our collective wisdom in generating the moral network power to co-create Project 2029 and undo the harms of Project 2025.
How might we learn from Heritage Foundation's history of developing Project 2025 to form a coalition of pro-democracy organizations about how to generate the light to illuminate the dark sides of alt-right propaganda, neo-terrorism, and cult indoctrination?
AI elaborates on the meaning and implications of this question.
What was the Heritage Foundation's timeline for developing the Project 2025?
How did the Heritage Foundation create its coalition-building model?
How might we learn from Project 2025 to build more highly effective pro-democracy coalitions to counter the neo-terrorism of alt-right propaganda machines and the self-religious fundamentalist religious tyranny of Christian Nationalism?
How might we develop a Project 2029 to counter the neo-terrorism and cult Indoctrination of alt-right propaganda and Christian Nationalism?
What can we learn from the emerging Pro-Democracy Coalition Models?
How might we identify 100 or more pro-democracy organizations to form a coalition to co-create Equity Project 2029?
Feedback on the first learning event on March 26th: 7-8 pm Central.
Bill Davis, Jim McGrath, and Joseph via NWSOFA (Chicago suburb) organized this Indivisible Zoom call.
Dr. Rick Botelho (family doctor and equity muse) was the guide-on-the-side to facilitate these micro-dose dialogue modules. I learned a great deal from prototyping this neo-learning session. Based on this experience, I refined the micro-dose emancipation dialogue sessions to liberate us from propaganda indoctrination and prejudices against equity, the virtue of fairness.
This Zoom meeting provided access to human AI-enabled neo-learning processes to set up the dialogue emancipation micro-doses as indoctrination antidotes to unravel the cultural, systemic, and individual prejudices against equity, the virtues of fairness.
The self-reflective learning of developing self-awareness from questioning ourselves about our critical thinking enables us to emancipate ourselves from the perils of religious and political indoctrination.
Lifelong intergenerational human-AI-enabled neo-learning
These dialogue micro-dose sessions are part of a longitudinal series of lifelong intergenerational learning opportunities about emancipating our thinking about how to cultivate equity meta-governance.
We must share a long-range vision about our shared future to get along on the middle ground of doing good for the commons, humanity, the common good, and the well-being of all life, and to regenerate the health of our planet.
Using emancipation antidotes, we set up dialogue micro-dose sessions to zoom out to the long game of equity governance to effectively play the short game of co-creating Equity Project 2029: developing equitable economic, educational, health, and social systems with fair opportunities for all.
This quest calls on us, the middle majority, to build the middle ground to co-create a Bipartisan purpleprint of Equity Project 2029 to:
Make America Fair For All (MAFFA)
Liberate Equity: Freedom for All
End the neo-terrorism of disinformation
Make America Think Again
Break the cult trance of blind unconditional loyalty
Stop the cancel culture wars of dysfunctional polarizations and toxic divisiveness
Heal the Divided States of America: the land of escalating inequities and unfair opportunities
First emancipation dialogue micro-dose as an indoctrination antidote
What is equity not?
Equity is not about cutting the line while climbing up the mountain of fair opportunities. Affirmative action is not about giving unfair opportunities to undeserving people, nor about discriminating against deserving people.
Affirmative action is about giving people who have unfair opportunities stacked against them to catch up to have fair chances at life, work, education, housing, and health care.
Equity is not about equal treatment or equal outcomes: consider how fair-minded, caring parents balance the dilemmas of treating children equally without favoritism, and each according to their needs (equity).
Caring mothers are the unsung heroes. They take predominant responsibilities of caring and nurturing children, and address the parental equality-equity dilemmas, with the support of their husbands and other family members if available.
Equity involves co-creating a shared dynamic meaning of fairness.
Equity is not a static definition: it changes depending on the situation and circumstances. It is not about never-ending charity and handouts. This calls for hourly pay and salaries above the basic minimum income to ensure that all people live above the survival line, with fair access to jobs, education, housing, and healthcare.
There is plenty of abundance in the world for all of us to live in flourishing communities. Yet we have gross inequalities in global and national wealth and systemic inequities in educational, health, and economic opportunities.
The Land of Liberty is the neoliberal free market without transparent accountability, putting profit above people, purpose, and the planet. The system rigs an uneven ground of unfair opportunities with escalating inequities: the rich get richer, leaving impoverished working families behind.
Politicians and plutocrats unfairly rig our political system to favor corporations and the financial elite, exploiting we, the people. The lack of transparent accountability calls for seeking the truth about what equity, the virtue of fairness, means to all of us.
This calls on us to call in a process of negotiating a shared meaning of equity.
Equity ensures that each of us, according to our needs, has fair opportunities to strive and thrive to our highest potential of healthy well-being.
Cultivating equity meta-governance is about co-creating a vast abundance of human resources and talents needed to co-design a fair, free, flourishing future on a regenerating planet for the benefit of all.
How might we reclaim the original meaning of equity to liberate a diverse abundance of hidden talents to solve complex entanglements of self-inflicted wicked political problems?
Wicked problems are complex because they have no single, simple, definitive, or final solutions, with no right or wrong answers. This calls on us to take the time for slow thinking.
How might we use human-AI-enabled neolearning and generative dialogues to understand how to address the complexities of ethical questions about how to co-create a fair-free-flourishing future on a regenerating planet?
Consider using these mindset-twisting questions when responding to the questions below.
In what ways is fairness American?
In what ways is unfairness un-American?
In what ways is unfairness American?
In what ways is fairness un-American?
First 15-minute dialogue micro-dose (three people).
AI elaborates on the meaning and implications of these paragraphs and the question above.
Discuss what the definitions of equity and equity meta-governance mean to you.
What are your objections to the definitions provided, if you have any?
How do you propose that we make progress on understanding and building agreements about the meaning and implications of equity?
After the dialogue session, share what you learned from your learning experience and ask additional questions. Use AI to respond to your question, and post the response.
Second 15-minute storytelling about BIPID issues
Think about a personal and/or professional story about BIPID issues: Biases, Isms, Prejudices, Inequities, Discrimination. Everyone has untold stories about unfairness.
Who influenced you the most about how to redress the unfairness of BIPID issues in your life?
Some of us are reluctant to explore our inequity stories because of negative associations (feelings of shame, self-blame, humiliation, and guilt), especially if affected by past histories of abuse and trauma.
Untold stories about BIPID keep us prisoners of our past. Story-telling and retelling of our stories have the power to heal our wounds and liberate us from triggering reactions.
Share your BIPID story
Each person will have 5 minutes to talk: less than 4 minutes to share a story about themselves and at least one minute for discussion.
How might you:
Tell your story in ways that people can learn from your experience.
Share your stories in ways that inspire people to prevent, preempt, and minimize the negative impact of BIPID issues?
Liberate Equity, Freedom for All
Click on this image for a human AI-enabled deep dive into equity meta-governance.